I couldn’t let this article pass without comment. This is a subject that needs to be studied, not just palmed off as irrelevant. The same people calling for cursive’s (in my day it was longhand) demise are nothing more than counter- cultural. These people, and some educators, are part of the problem with functional illiteracy. I don’t want to preach, but the excuses are poppy-cock. Anyway, here is the article.
Is cursive writing dead?
A single sentence, uttered in the trial of George Zimmerman for the shooting of teenager Trayvon Martin, has catapulted an issue into the national spotlight.
When asked if she could read a letter in court, witness Rachel Jeantel, her head bowed, murmured with embarrassment,
“I don’t read cursive,”
according to court testimony.
Is it any surprise that cursive — the looped, curvaceous style of handwriting that’s been a mainstay of education for generations — is all but dead? [
15 Weird Things We Do Everyday, and Why]
“Cursive should be allowed to die. In fact, it’s already dying, despite having been taught for decades,” Morgan Polikoff, assistant professor of education at the University of Southern California’s Rossier School of Education, told The New York Times.
“Very small proportions of adults use cursive for their day-to-day writing,” Polikoff said. “Much of our communication is done on a keyboard, and the rest is done with print.”
The recently established Common Core State Standards, the standardized educational benchmarks for U.S. public schools, omit cursive as a requirement. Some states, including Indiana and Hawaii, had dropped cursive from their curricula in favor of keyboard proficiency as early as 2011.
“I think it’s important to have nice handwriting, but the importance of having to learn two kinds of handwriting seems unnecessary given the vast method of communication is on a keyboard,” Polikoff told the
Los Angeles Times.
Carrying the cursive torch
Nonetheless, cursive has its aficionados, who note that many historical documents will be illegible if people can’t read or write in cursive.
“Cursive writing is a long-held cultural tradition in this country and should continue to be taught; not just for the sake of tradition, but also to preserve the history of our nation,” Jimmy Bryant, director of archives and special collections at the University of Central Arkansas, told The New York Times.
Others claim cursive is important because it’s faster and more efficient than printed writing.
“It’s not calligraphy. It’s functional,” Suzanne Asherson of Handwriting Without Tears, a handwriting program for teachers, told the Los Angeles Times. “When a child knows the mechanics of forming letters in cursive, they can better focus on their content.”
Handwriting Without Tears advocates a simpler method of cursive writing, minus all the curls, loops and other decorative flourishes.
Writing in general, regardless of whether it’s cursive, may also boost brain activity, according to a 2010 study finding that preschool students who wrote out letters rather than just viewing them showed changes in brain activity when they later viewed those letters. “Coupled with other work from our lab, we interpret this as the motor system augmenting visual processing,” said study researcher Karin Harman James of Indiana University in a statement. “In the case of learning letters, printing helps children recognize letters.”
Higher test scores?
Anderson points critics to a recent study by the College Board, which found that SAT test essays written in cursive received a slightly higher score than those written in printed letters.
But Polikoff and others aren’t impressed. The College Board study “is not evidence of anything,” he told the Los Angeles Times. “It doesn’t indicate that the knowledge of cursive causes higher scores.”
“As we have done with the abacus and the slide rule, it is time to retire the teaching of cursive,” Polikoff told The New York Times. “The writing is on the wall.”
Follow Marc Lallanilla on Twitter and Google+. Follow us @livescience, Facebook